Navigating Complex Commercial Litigation: A Practical Guide for Businesses

Introduction

Commercial disputes are unfortunately an inevitable feature of doing business (especially where contracts are high-value, supply chains are complex, and relationships span multiple jurisdictions). When a dispute escalates, litigation can feel opaque, time-consuming, and risky. The reality is that most commercial claims are won (or lost) well before trial, through early case assessment, evidence preservation, procedural strategy, and disciplined settlement positioning.

This guide explains, in practical terms, how complex commercial litigation typically works, what businesses should do at each stage, and how to manage risk, costs, and outcomes.

What Is Complex Commercial Litigation?

Commercial litigation is considered “complex” where disputes involve substantial financial exposure, multiple parties, technical subject matter, or large volumes of documents. Complexity often arises in cases involving shareholder disputes, breach of high-value commercial contracts, professional negligence claims, technology or construction disputes, and cross-border matters.

Additional complexity may result from urgency (such as the need for injunctive relief) or from jurisdictional issues where parties or assets are located overseas. In these cases, early strategic planning is essential to avoid unnecessary cost and risk.

Early Case Assessment and Strategic Planning

The most important decisions in litigation are often made before proceedings are issued. Early case assessment allows a business to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of its position, quantify potential exposure, and decide whether litigation aligns with its commercial objectives.

At this stage, businesses should consider what outcome they are seeking, whether that is damages, termination of a contract, injunctive relief, or a negotiated settlement. It is equally important to assess reputational risk, management time, and the impact on ongoing commercial relationships.

Preserving Evidence and Managing Data

Evidence preservation is a critical early step and one of the most common areas where businesses inadvertently undermine their position. Once litigation is contemplated, steps should be taken immediately to preserve relevant documents and electronic data.

This includes emails, contracts, internal reports, messaging platforms, financial records, and data held on personal devices used for business purposes. Implementing a formal litigation hold helps prevent deletion and ensures compliance with disclosure obligations later in the process.

Failure to preserve evidence can result in adverse inferences being drawn by the court and, in serious cases, sanctions.

Understanding the Contractual and Legal Framework

Most commercial disputes turn on the interpretation and application of contractual terms. A careful review of the relevant agreements is essential, including any amendments, side letters, or incorporated terms.

Key provisions often include limitation and exclusion clauses, termination rights, notice requirements, dispute resolution clauses, and governing law and jurisdiction provisions. These clauses frequently determine not only liability, but also where and how a dispute can be pursued.

Limitation periods must also be considered at an early stage, as claims issued out of time may be irrecoverable regardless of their merits.

The Pre-Action Stage and Protocol Compliance

Before issuing proceedings, parties are generally expected to comply with the Practice Direction on Pre-Action Conduct and Protocols, or a specific pre-action protocol where applicable. The purpose of this stage is to encourage the exchange of information, clarify the issues in dispute, and explore settlement.

This typically involves a formal letter of claim setting out the legal and factual basis of the case, followed by a substantive response. Courts expect parties to engage constructively and to consider alternative dispute resolution, such as mediation.

Unreasonable refusal to engage in settlement discussions or non-compliance with pre-action obligations can result in adverse costs consequences later.

Issuing Proceedings and Pleadings

If a dispute cannot be resolved pre-action, proceedings may be issued. Most complex commercial disputes are brought in the High Court, often within the Business and Property Courts (but the correct forum depends on the nature of the claim).

The claimant must clearly plead its case through the claim form and particulars of claim, setting out the legal basis, factual background, and relief sought. The defendant will then respond with a defence and may bring a counterclaim.

Well-drafted pleadings are essential. Overly aggressive or unfocused pleadings can increase costs and weaken credibility, whereas a concise, evidence-based case improves prospects both at trial and in settlement discussions.

Case Management and Court Directions

Once the parties’ pleadings have been filed at the Court and served on each other, the court will actively manage the case through case management conferences and directions orders. The aim is to ensure that the dispute is resolved efficiently and proportionately.

The court will set a timetable covering disclosure, witness evidence, expert evidence, and trial preparation. Businesses should view litigation at this stage as a structured project, with clear internal ownership, regular review points, and ongoing cost monitoring.

Disclosure and eDisclosure Challenges

Disclosure is often one of the most time-consuming and expensive phases of complex commercial litigation. Parties are required to disclose documents that support or undermine their case or that of the opposing party.

In document-heavy disputes, particularly those involving digital communications, careful planning is essential. This includes identifying relevant custodians, systems, and data sources, and even using appropriate eDisclosure tools to manage volume and cost.

Witness Evidence and Credibility

Witness evidence plays a critical role in commercial litigation. Witness statements should reflect the witness’s actual knowledge of events and be consistent with contemporaneous documents.

Courts are increasingly critical of statements that are overly argumentative or drafted as advocacy rather than evidence. A smaller number of credible, well-prepared witnesses is usually more effective than a large cast offering marginal evidence.

Expert Evidence in Technical Disputes

Many complex commercial cases require expert evidence to address technical or specialist issues such as valuation, accounting, engineering, IT systems, or delay analysis.

Experts owe their duty to the court rather than the instructing party. Selecting the right expert and giving clear, focused instructions is essential. Expert evidence should be tightly aligned with the issues in dispute and the pleaded case.

Interim Applications and Tactical Remedies

In some cases, interim court applications may be necessary. These include applications for interim injunctions, freezing orders, security for costs, or summary judgment.

Such applications can be powerful tools but also carry cost and risk. They should be deployed strategically and only where they advance the overall objectives of the litigation.

Managing Costs and Litigation Risk

Costs are often the most significant risk factor in complex commercial litigation. While the general rule in England and Wales is that the unsuccessful party will be ordered to pay the successful party’s costs, recovery is rarely complete (i.e., it would be extremely unlikely that you would be able to recover 100% of your costs) and costs recovery is always subject to the court’s discretion. If you win at trial, you may be able to recover up to 65% or 70% of your costs, although this is at the discretion of the Court and by no means certain). Factors such as the parties’ conduct, proportionality, compliance with procedural rules and engagement in alternative dispute resolution (ADR) can materially affect the ultimate costs outcome. Costs may also be subject to detailed assessment if not agreed.

From an early stage, businesses should approach litigation with a clear understanding of potential costs exposure, not only in pursuing or defending a claim, but also in relation to adverse costs risk if the case does not succeed. This requires ongoing assessment as the dispute develops, particularly where issues expand, interim applications are pursued, or settlement opportunities arise.

Courts take conduct into account when making costs orders, including cooperation, reasonableness, and engagement in ADR as well as compliance with relevant pre-action protocols. Businesses should maintain realistic budgets and regularly review settlement options as the case progresses.

Costs Budgeting

In many high value or complex disputes, the court requires parties to prepare and exchange detailed costs budgets using Precedent H. This work will usually be carried out by an expert costs draftsperson. This document sets out estimated costs by litigation phase, from pre-action through to trial and sometimes post-trial or contingent steps. Once approved or agreed, the budget operates as a costs management tool, and parties are generally restricted to recovering costs within the approved figures unless there is good reason to depart from them.

Where a party seeks to vary its approved budget due to significant developments in the case, it must do so promptly and transparently. Failure to manage budgets actively can result in otherwise reasonable costs being irrecoverable.

Following the conclusion of a case, or a discrete phase of it, costs may be subject to summary or detailed assessment. Effective costs management is therefore not simply an administrative exercise. It is a strategic tool that influences how litigation is conducted, how risks are evaluated, and how settlement decisions are made. Businesses that understand and engage with the costs regime from the outset are far better placed to control exposure, maintain leverage, and avoid unpleasant surprises at the end of a dispute.

Settlement and Alternative Dispute Resolution

The majority of commercial disputes settle before trial. Settlement is not a sign of weakness but a commercial decision based on risk, cost, and outcome certainty.

Mediation is particularly effective in both small and complex disputes alike, offering flexibility and confidentiality. A well-prepared mediation, supported by a credible litigation strategy, often results in favourable outcomes.

We can advise and assist with all types of ADR methodologies, including mediation and arbitration. We can also recommend suitable and diligent independent mediators where required.

Trial, Judgment, and Enforcement

If a case proceeds to trial, the court will focus on the documents relevant to the case and evidence contained in those documents, witness credibility, and expert evidence. Even strong cases involve litigation risk, which must be weighed against potential reward.

A successful judgment is only valuable if it can be enforced. Businesses should consider enforcement strategy early, particularly where assets are held overseas or insolvency risk exists. Just because you win at trial does not mean that the other side will pay up or do what has been ordered. Enforcement strategy is a separate kettle of fish entirely – please feel free to read up on this topic here.

Conclusion & How We Can Help

Complex commercial litigation can have far-reaching consequences for businesses, extending well beyond the immediate dispute. Claims involving high-value contracts, multiple parties, technical issues or cross-border elements often place significant strain on management time, cashflow and commercial relationships. While litigation is sometimes unavoidable, outcomes are rarely determined by legal merit alone. Strategic decision-making, evidence management, procedural discipline and cost control play a decisive role.

For businesses, the risks of approaching litigation reactively or without specialist guidance are considerable. Poor early case assessment, failure to preserve documents, overly aggressive pleadings or missed opportunities for settlement can materially weaken a party’s position. Equally, misunderstanding procedural obligations or underestimating costs exposure can result in disputes escalating further than anticipated, with outcomes that are commercially unsatisfactory even where a claim or defence has merit.

The consequences of mismanaging complex litigation are rarely abstract. They can include excessive irrecoverable costs, adverse costs orders, loss of commercial leverage, reputational damage, and outcomes that disrupt long-term business objectives. Early, informed advice allows disputes to be approached strategically, whether that means achieving early resolution, securing interim protection, or pursuing a claim robustly through to trial where appropriate.

Our commercial litigation team regularly advises businesses, directors, shareholders and investors on complex and high-value disputes across a wide range of sectors. We combine technical litigation expertise with a pragmatic, commercially focused approach. In relation to complex commercial litigation, we can assist by:

• assessing the merits, risks and commercial objectives of a dispute at an early stage, including realistic outcome and costs analysis;
• advising on pre-action strategy, evidence preservation and compliance with procedural requirements, including engagement in ADR where appropriate;
• drafting and responding to pre-action correspondence and pleadings with a focus on clarity, leverage and proportionality;
• managing complex disclosure exercises, including privilege issues and data-heavy disputes;
• advising on and pursuing interim remedies such as injunctions, freezing orders and security for costs where strategic advantage or protection is required;
• instructing and managing expert evidence in technical or valuation-driven disputes; and
• supporting clients through mediation and settlement negotiations, as well as representing them through to trial and enforcement where necessary.

If you are facing a complex commercial dispute, or would like to understand your options before a matter escalates, we recommend taking early advice. Please email wewillhelp@jonathanlea.net or call us on 01444 708640 as a first step. Following an initial discussion, we can provide a clear scope of work, a fee estimate, and confirm what information or documentation we would need to review.

We usually offer a no-cost, no-obligation 20-minute introductory call as a starting point or, in some cases, if you would just like some initial advice and guidance, we can instead offer a one-hour fixed fee appointment (charged from £250 plus VAT depending on the complexity of issues and seniority of the fee earner).

Please email wewillhelp@jonathanlea.net or call us on 01444 708640 as a first step. Following an initial discussion, we can provide a clear scope of work, a fee estimate (or fixed fee where appropriate), and confirm any information or documentation we would need to review.

 

* VAT is charged at 20%

This article is intended for general information only, applies to the law at the time of publication, is not specific to the facts of your case and is not intended to be a replacement for legal advice. It is recommended that specific professional advice is sought before relying on any of the information given. © Jonathan Lea Limited. 

Photo by Walls.io on Unsplash