
Mergers & Acquisitions Tax: Structuring Transactions for Efficiency and Certainty
Tax is a central variable in any merger or acquisition. The structure adopted at the outset — share sale, asset sale, hive-up, hive-down, or group reorganisation — can materially affect value, risk allocation and post-completion outcomes.
Effective M&A tax planning is not about last-minute mitigation. It requires early-stage analysis aligned with commercial objectives, deal mechanics and long-term strategy.
At Jonathan Lea Network, we provide integrated legal and transactional tax support to buyers, sellers and investor-backed businesses across the full M&A lifecycle.
Share Sale vs Asset Sale: Tax Implications
One of the earliest and most commercially sensitive decisions in any transaction concerns structure.
Share Sale
For sellers, a share sale may offer:
- Potential access to Business Asset Disposal Relief (where conditions are met)
- Simpler exit from the trading entity
- Clean transfer of contracts and employees
For buyers, however, a share acquisition involves inheriting historic liabilities. Tax due diligence and warranty protection become critical.
Asset Sale
An asset sale may:
- Allow buyers to “step up” base cost for capital allowances
- Ring-fence historic liabilities
- Enable selective acquisition of assets
However, sellers may face corporation tax on chargeable gains and potentially double taxation if funds are extracted.
The optimal structure depends on commercial leverage, tax profile and future strategy.
Pre-Sale Tax Planning for Sellers
Advance planning can materially improve tax outcomes.
This may include:
- Group reorganisations prior to disposal
- Share-for-share exchanges
- Demergers or hive-downs
- Ensuring trading status for relief qualification
- Reviewing shareholder eligibility for available reliefs
Timing is critical. Many reliefs require minimum holding periods or structural conditions to be satisfied well before completion.
We assist sellers in structuring early to protect net proceeds.
Buyer-Side Tax Due Diligence
Buyers must identify and price tax risk appropriately.
Tax due diligence typically focuses on:
- Corporation tax compliance
- VAT position and partial exemption risk
- PAYE and employment-related securities
- Transfer pricing exposure
- Historic relief claims
- SDLT and property-related liabilities
Findings inform:
- Purchase price negotiations
- Warranty scope
- Indemnity drafting
- Retention or escrow arrangements
Effective coordination between tax analysis and SPA drafting is essential to avoid protection gaps.
Transaction Mechanics and Tax Structuring
M&A transactions frequently involve technical structuring considerations, including:
- Use of acquisition vehicles
- Debt push-down strategies
- Availability of substantial shareholding exemption
- Loss utilisation within groups
- Capital allowances optimisation
- VAT transfer of a going concern (TOGC) treatment
Misalignment between tax structuring and legal execution can create unintended exposure.
We ensure transaction documentation accurately reflects intended tax outcomes.
Private Equity and Investor-Led Transactions
In investor-backed deals, tax structuring often involves:
- Management equity arrangements
- Sweet equity and growth shares
- Ratchet mechanisms
- Loan note structures
- Institutional preference rights
These require careful integration with employment-related securities rules and corporate documentation.
We advise on structuring that remains compliant while supporting incentive alignment.
Cross-Border Considerations
Where transactions involve overseas entities or assets, additional complexity may arise, including:
- Withholding taxes
- Double tax treaty interaction
- Permanent establishment risk
- Hybrid mismatch considerations
- Exit charges
Early identification of cross-border issues prevents disruption later in the deal process.
Clearance Applications and Risk Management
In certain restructurings, statutory clearances may be advisable to confirm tax treatment in advance.
We advise on:
- Whether clearance is appropriate
- Drafting applications
- Managing HMRC correspondence
- Evidential support for commercial rationale
Structured documentation reduces challenge risk and enhances transactional certainty.
Post-Completion Planning
Tax planning does not end at completion. Buyers and sellers may need to address:
- Integration of acquired entities
- Group loss planning
- Refinancing structures
- Deferred consideration tax treatment
- Earn-out taxation
Early coordination ensures the post-deal structure supports ongoing efficiency.
Our Role in M&A Tax Transactions
We provide:
- Pre-transaction tax structuring advice
- Buyer and seller-side tax analysis
- Integration of tax planning with SPA and APA drafting
- Risk allocation support through warranties and indemnities
- Clearance strategy and implementation
- Post-completion structuring support
Our focus is commercially grounded, technically precise and aligned with transaction execution timelines.
Protecting Value Through Structured Tax Planning
In mergers and acquisitions, tax is rarely neutral. It influences pricing, structure, negotiation leverage and post-completion risk. Early, integrated tax advice ensures that transactions are structured efficiently, defensibly and in alignment with long-term commercial objectives. If you are planning an acquisition, disposal or corporate restructuring, disciplined M&A tax planning can materially affect the net outcome.
Speak to Our M&A Tax Team
If you are contemplating a disposal, acquisition or investor-led transaction, tax structuring should be addressed at the outset, not retrofitted during negotiations.
Engage our M&A tax team early to ensure your transaction is structured efficiently, documented coherently and protected against avoidable risk.
Call us on 01444 708640 or email wewillhelp@jonathanlea.net to arrange a confidential discussion.
FAQ: Mergers & Acquisitions Tax
SSE can exempt gains on the disposal of trading subsidiaries, but the conditions are technical. The seller must generally have held at least 10% of the ordinary share capital for a continuous 12-month period within the preceding six years, and both the disposing company and the target must meet trading requirements. Pre-sale reorganisations can inadvertently compromise trading status if not structured carefully. The tax treatment of earn-outs depends on whether they are structured as ascertainable or unascertainable consideration. This affects the timing of capital gains tax or corporation tax and the availability of reliefs. Poor drafting can convert what was intended to be capital treatment into income, particularly where management shareholders remain involved post-completion. Debt push-down can enhance interest deductibility within the target group, but must be assessed against the Corporate Interest Restriction (CIR) rules, transfer pricing, unallowable purpose provisions, and hybrid mismatch legislation. Structuring must also align with Companies Act constraints and lender requirements. VAT transfer of a going concern (TOGC) treatment can prevent VAT leakage on asset acquisitions, but it is highly technical. Failure to meet conditions — such as incorrect option to tax notifications or changes in intended use — can result in unexpected VAT liabilities and cash flow disruption.
Transactions designed to secure reliefs (such as demergers or share exchanges) must satisfy “bona fide commercial purpose” tests and avoid main-purpose tax avoidance characterisation. Clearance may be advisable where restructuring precedes a disposal, particularly in private equity or management buy-out contexts.
Photo by Glenn Carstens-Peters on Unsplash
Our Corporate Tax Team
What Our Clients Say
Request a Free
No Obligation
20 Minute Call
This introductory call is to discuss your matter so we can provide a well-considered quote.
However, please be aware that the free 20 minute call is at our discretion. If you are more looking for advice and guidance on an initial call, we may instead offer a one-hour fixed fee appointment instead.
Our fixed fee appointments are between £250 plus VAT to £350 plus VAT* depending on the complexity of the issues and seniority of solicitor taking the call





